IMF downgrades US again, but at least it’s celebration time for Russia and Africa

The IMF is putting on a passable impression of a cat chasing its tail at the moment. Yesterday, it revised its latest estimates for global economic growth this year, and once again downgraded its forecasts for the US. Yet this august economics institution, which is supposed to be ahead of the curve, really only seemed to confirm what most of us suspected at the time when its previous set of projections were released, that they were far too optimistic.

The IMF now reckons the US will grow at 1.5 per cent this year. Last autumn, it projected growth of 1.9 per cent.

But in the press conference accompanying the announcement of the latest data, the IMF emphasised the risks to its forecasts were on the down side.

Interestingly, it reckons that the recent tax breaks announced by George W will add around 0.2 to 0.3 per cent to growth – meaning that without these measures, the US would barely be crawling forward at a rate above 1 per cent. This in turn makes one ask what was the IMF thinking of with its more-bullish projections three months ago.

As for all this talk about decoupling, the idea the rest of the world can grow without the US, Simon Johnson, Economic Counsellor and Director, Research Department of the IMF said, “Reports of decoupling have been greatly exaggerated.”

Mind you, that note of cynicism does not appear to be borne out by the figures.

The IMF reckons China will grow by 10 per cent this year, but perhaps more interestingly, is pencilling-in growth of 7 per cent in both the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and Africa.

The IMF has joined a list of forecasters expecting big things from Russia this year, and isn’t it good to see expectations for Africa rise? Although, it is difficult not to be cynical about any form of good news predicted for Africa, these days. After all, just a few months ago, economists were pointing to Kenya as an example of how Africa can prosper.

 proj imf

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

Is the High Street seeing a soft landing?

Well, there was good news amongst the bad from the CBI yesterday.

In the latest instalment in its distributive trades survey, the CBI said the balance between retailers saying sales were up, minus those saying they were down, during the first two weeks of January, was the lowest since November 2006. In fact, 39 per cent of respondents said year-on-year sales volumes rose in the first half of January, while 34 per cent said they were down; that makes, after allowing for rounding, a balance of plus 4.

But, here is the good news, retailers do see conditions improving next month, with a balance of 10 per cent expecting sales to grow, although this would still be somewhat slower growth than the average for the second half of 2007.

John Longworth, chairman of the CBI’s Distributive Trades Panel, said: “The January sales were a little flat this year, and were weaker than the lacklustre lead-up to Christmas.

“While sales of groceries and household essentials went quite well, shoppers are watching their wallets, and that can be seen in the big drop in sales of big-ticket items like TVs and washing machines.

“However, this survey and recent CBI manufacturing data show that, while market turbulence is undoubtedly affecting consumer confidence, the economy as a whole is nonetheless bearing up and is continuing to grow, if more slowly.

“Overall retail sales were still better than expected this month, and the High Street does predict a slight improvement in February.”

 cbi_retail

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

chart of the day

cons conf

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

2008-01-30 markets

markets

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

2008-01-30

Rates Close Change
Oil 92.32 1.45
Gold 927.2 -6.3
$ to £ 1.99 0.0031
€ to £ 1.3474 0.0034
$ to € 1.4768 -0.0015

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

2008-01-30 FTSE 100, Dow, NASDAQ

Index Close Change
FTSE 100 5885.2 96.3
Dow 12480.3 96.4
NASDAQ 2358.1 8.2

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

US house prices fall again as prospects plunge even further

And records came a-tumbling. The supply of new homes now available in the US is at a 26-year high, the annual drop in the median price of new homes for sale saw its biggest annual decline since 1970, and here is the big one, 2007 saw the biggest fall in new-home sales ever recorded in the US.

The catalogue of woe really is stunning.

The median price of new homes in the US fell by 10.4 per cent to $219,200, although the jury is out on how serious this is. Capital Economics pointed out that this particular price data is notoriously volatile, and cautioned against reading “too much into that figure.” Interestingly, the falls in prices were very much restricted to certain regions, with the south and west taking the lion’s share of the bad news. That’s the problem you have with gauging the US housing market, it covers such a large and diverse country that median price really only paints the broadest of pictures.

Even so, there is evidence that US house builders were offering various incentives to try and push sales along – for example covering the purchasers’ legal costs, or providing extra features, so if anything, it would appear the true cost of a new home fell by even more than the level the published data suggests.

Moving forward, we need to turn our attention to expected supply and demand. And this is where the real worry sits.

If sales have fallen to the lowest level ever recorded, then we must assume demand is very low. Well there is no Nobel prize available for pointing that one out. The US consumer appears to have done something many economists have in the past dismissed as one of those things that can never happen, for Uncle Sam and Auntie Samantha have taken to their sick room, with rugs pulled up to their chests, medicine flowing like free wine, while dialling 911 for the economic doctor to be quick.

But while demand falls, supply has rocketed. There are now 490,000 new homes for sale; to put that in context, the year to December saw 604,000 new homes being sold, so, right now, there are plenty of homes out there to meet demand.

Then to cap it all, First American Core Logic has released a report saying the risk of foreclosure is soaring.

So that’s a pretty unpleasant picture to behold.

What lessons can we learn? Well, for one thing, the US experience shows that a country does not have to be in recession, or suffering from rising unemployment, for the housing market to hit crisis. The current US housing woe does seem to be at a similar level of severity to the one experienced in the UK in the early 1990s. So-called experts have dismissed the idea of the UK seeing a repeat of the early ‘90s experience because they say while the job market is strong, house prices will never fall. In fact, the US experience shows us that this relationship can work the other way round, and a crisis in housing can cause economic recession.

It might just be worth bearing in mind, however, that, actually, even before prices started to fall, your average US home was very cheap. Now the median price in the US is $219,999, the equivalent of just over £110,000.

Is that a good thing or a bad thing? We are repeatedly told that soaring house prices in the UK are a good thing, but surely, when the average price is so high that it is beyond the reach of the average buyer, and makes the cost of repaying a mortgage, or rent, take up a massive chunk of disposable income, it is a bad thing.

Finally, the news on US housing provides yet more evidence, to join an already-massive mountain of historical experience, that markets that display all the symptoms of a bubble, are in fact bubbles, which always burst.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

Where next for the pound?

There is a mystery a-brewing. US interest rates are falling like a pig, shorn of its wings, from the sky. And yet the dollar has not fallen in tandem. If you take into account interest rate expectations, then this really becomes quite surprising. Fed chairman, Ben Bernanke, has metaphorically chartered a fleet of helicopters carrying monetary stimulus to try and boost the US economy, but, by contrast, the central bank in the UK still seems to be fretting over inflation and this moral hazard argument – that banks are being bailed out through encouraging them to do more of the same things that created the mess in the first place.

Put all that together and it would appear the gap between US and UK interest rates is set to climb.   Then take into account that Until March last year, US and UK interest rates were the same. Then the Fed lowered rates while the Bank of England raised them.

In the short term there seem to be two main reasons for money to flow into a country. Money will flow in to chase higher interest payments, and it will flow in if the recipient country is seen to be having good economic prospects.

Bear that in mind, and all of a sudden the reasons for the sharp fall in the dollar relative to the pound last year become clear.

But the pound has since dropped back, falling from $2.10 last autumn to this morning’s price of 1.98. So if the expectations for US interest rates are so low, while at the same time the outlook for the US economy seems awful, why has the pound weakened?

It seems there are three possible explanations. Explanation 1: markets believe the Bank of England will change its tune, and will soon join the Fed in a race to see who can cut interest rates the quickest. Explanation 2: markets expect the UK economy to go the way of the US, and slow, possibly even toying with recession. Explanation 3: things are actually working the way the economic text books say they should, and the pound is at last responding to the fact the UK suffers from a massive deficit on its current account.

Recently, the deficit in Britain’s balance of payments current account as a percentage of GDP overtook the deficit seen in the US, but even that doesn’t tell the full story. One theory doing the rounds is that the official figures on Britain’s balance of payments deficits understate the reality, because the figures don’t accurately reflect the extent to which UK company profits have occurred overseas.

It was about this time last year that Warren Buffett said he was getting out of dollars; there was no magical reason for his decision. He decided the US current account deficit was too high.

Economists have for some time dismissed current account deficits as not really mattering  if capital flows into the country with the deficit increase.  It is certainly the case that both the US and UK are on the receiving end of massive capital flows.

Maybe, though, investors have become more discerning. Sovereign Wealth Funds are demanding an awful lot more bang for their buck, while the dollar and perhaps the pound have lost much of their appeal to investors.

Maybe this is the true reason for the credit crunch, foreigners are no longer happy to pump money into the economies of the Anglo Saxon world for such a lousy return.

And what is the lesson for this story? It is that in the long run, deficits in the balance of payments current account do matter, after all. For years, economists have dismissed as groundless, fears that the US balance of payments deficit would end in tears, saying this was as about as likely as pigs flying. Well, it seems that just may have happened. The economic pig may have taken to the wing.  

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

Household spending – 50 years of progress

If you take a hard gander at the latest report from the Office for National Statistics, looking at family spending over the last 50 years, there are no real surprises. But it makes a fascinating read, all the same – and maybe there are lessons to be learned.

First fascinating thing, which should come as no surprise, is the amount we spend on food and non-alcoholic drinks. Back in 1957, 33 per cent of the average household’s weekly budget was taken by spending in this area. But by 2006, spending had reduced to 15 per cent of the budget.

Then there’s tobacco. Half a century ago, your average household forked out 6 per cent of its readies on a smoke. Today, it’s just 1 per cent. The amount we spend on footwear and clothing halved too, falling from 10 per cent to 5 per cent.

But alas, while economic progress gave with one hand, it took with the other, because our spending on housing (including mortgage interest payments and rent) is now the single-largest item, accounting for 19 per cent of spending. In 1957, housing accounted for just 9 per cent.

So here is the first lesson. It appears that in the UK, while the amount of money we save on food, clothing and tobacco, rises, we have spent much of the saving on our houses. Presumably, soaring house prices have eaten up much of our economic gain, perhaps in turn reducing the extent to which we are truly better off.

Then there is fuel. The amount we have spent on fuel, light and power has halved over the period. No wonder the soaring price of oil hasn’t led to an economic disaster as it once would have done. That’s the second lesson we learn from the data.

But the third is a more-general point. Economic theory tells us that as our incomes rises, we save more. It was partly for that reason that Keynes said a partial solution to solving an economic depression was to boost the incomes of poorer families – via creating jobs and unemployment benefit. Those same sentiments have been repeated recently, with George W’s recent tax announcement being hailed as a Keynesian move, because it especially benefits poorer Americans.

That man Joseph Stiglitz, the economist described here yesterday as the possible successor to Keynes, talked about tax cuts benefiting the poor as being the partial solution to the current economic crisis.

But, actually, what the latest data from the Office for National Statistics seems to tell us is that increases in income only lead to increases in saving in the short-run.

In time, we always find new ways to spend our increased wealth. The ONS stats, for example, only started measuring leisure services from 1987, so small was this area before then, and yet by 2006 this took up 15 per cent of our spending, making it the joint second-largest area of our spending, second only to housing costs, and tying with food and non-alcoholic drink for second spot.

The ONS says average gross household income in 2006 was £642 a week. Of this amount £62 was spent on transport, £58.50 on recreation and leisure, £37.90 on restaurants and hotels, and £11.70 on communication.

We are better off, sure, but our debts keep soaring, and we always seem to want more. It seems the more we earn, the more we yearn.

household exp

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

Chart of the day

household exp

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit