House prices have stopped falling – more or less, at least that is the implication of the latest housing market report from the Halifax.
In its most recent survey, published on Friday, it had house prices down 1.3 per cent in April, taking the annual rate to -0.9 per cent. “We expect a mid single digit percentage decline in UK house prices this year,” it said.
But then, after acknowledging some difficulties with the economy, said, “High employment and low interest rates support house prices.” And its chief economist Martin Ellis said, “Price falls should be viewed in the context of the substantial price rises over recent years. UK prices nearly trebled over the ten years to August 2007. A growing economy, high employment levels, low interest rates and a shortage of new homes underpin housing valuations.”
But this is what is odd. Halifax predicts a mid single digit percentage decline in house prices, yet a quick look at their figures reveals that house prices in April were already around 5 per cent down on August last year. Back then, it had average prices at £199,600, now it is recording average prices of £189,027.
In other words, for the Halifax prediction of mid single digit prices to be right, house prices must stop falling now. The implication is they have reached bottom already.
Yet with mortgage approvals figures going from bad to worse, with surveys from the likes of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors suggesting inventories levels are rising, it does seem a little hard to believe we have seen the worst of it.
If you believe, of course, that house prices have been driven up by speculative motives, with buy-to-let investors buying in the belief prices will go up, and first-time buyers spending more money than they could really afford in the belief prices would go up, then actually, it seems likely prices have a lot further to fall.
But while the likes of the Halifax and Nationwide continue to try and put a positive gloss on things, their lending arms are doing the opposite.
This morning, Graham Beale, the chief executive of Nationwide was quoted in the FT as saying, “I can’t see 100 per cent loan-to-value loans returning in the market in the medium-term let alone the short term.”
Last week, the Halifax announced it was to stop offering home loans on its standard variable interest rate to new customers from 3 May.
Mortgage lenders are not passing on the Bank of England rate cuts to lenders. Regardless of the reasons for this, the fact is house prices are falling partially as a result of this policy.
For many years the dynamic duo of the Halifax and Nationwide have been making nice soft noises about the strength of house prices. This in turn must surely have influenced Channel Four and the BBC with their glut of programmes promoting the housing market and property investment. Not to mention, filled estate agents with even more hope than comes naturally to them.
It seems likely that the Halifax and Nationwide are at least partly responsible for house prices rising too high.
But with power comes responsibility and, frankly, they need to do more. It is time they put their money where their mouths have been and support their predictions with more-generous lending terms.
It won’t happen, of course. Mortgage lenders talk up house prices, but take no responsibility when they fall.
It used to be like that for investment in shares, but then the regulator put an end to that, with all those caveats about how shares can go down as well as up.
For the last ten years, with regards to housing, the regulator has been asleep at the wheel, and the banks have been far too easy with the gas – both in terms of gas in the form of money and gas in the form of hot air, pumped directly into a bubble made of hype.






Soft on house price inflation, soft on the causes of house price inflation.
Regulators asleep at the wheel?
Oh no! It was a nice little earner all around.
It was the acceptable face of inflation actually sanctioned and encouraged by the Treasury - all that lovely stamp duty £31 billion of it in the last 10 years.
Beloved of the lenders who encouraged ever high borrrowing by increasing both earnings multiples 3.5 then 4 then 5 then 6 then 7 times and on the other side increasing the loan to value from 95% to 100% to 105% to 100% to 125%.
Justified and supported by the regulators - distressed debt “everyones a winner” Milan October 2006 by our very own FSA in the guise of Dr. Hurteas.
Lenders do you have debt you are not to sure about and want to rid your balance sheet of it? Then do we have news for you.
Slice and dice it with some not so worrysome debt and get a rating agency to give it a nice investment grade and then sell it on. You win by getting rid of the “distressed” and you get fresh cash in to lend again. Hey sounds good let’s have some of that. Trouble is when your left hand is packaging and selling it out one door the right is buying it back in resliced and diced!
Round and round it goes where it stops nobody knows.
Till pop! everyones a loser - especially the taxpayer who has had to step in and pay for it all as well as the customers and staff at Northern Rock and now the workers in the mortgage business - where it will end nobody knows.
Mid digit house price fall? (do i hear axes grinding?) I am not so sure history has shown steeper corrections are the norm and as someone once said history has a habit of repeating itself.report this comment