UK job losses mount, but this is just the beginning

You will recall that the Halifax and Nationwide keep saying how the strong labour market will protect house prices. Yet, consider this.

The latest data from the Office for National Statistics, out yesterday, revealed the biggest rise in the claimant count since 1991. All in all, unemployment, or at least the claimant count, rose 15,000 in June, taking the cumulative rise this year to 45,000.

Mind you, employment is still rising. So, as ever with statistics, you can read good or bad into the data, depending on your inclination.

But then again, increases in the growth of employment have been falling for four quarters in a row.

But this is the figure to really get the alarm bells ringing.

Capital Economics reckons unemployment may have risen by 900,000 by 2010.

But what about this wave of public sector strikes? What effect will that have?

Capital Economics says: “We think that comparisons with the 1970s are overdone. Not only is industrial action now only really prevalent in the public sector, but the dire state of the Government’s finances suggests that it is unlikely to give into demands for higher pay. Meanwhile, the fact that unemployment is now rising fairly sharply should keep a lid on pay growth in the private sector.”

We would agree. The labour market is much more flexible these days. Jobs are under threat. In the 1970s the miners could go on strike, and we ended up with power cuts, and working a three-day week. That can not happen today.

One can have sympathy with public sector workers desperately trying to make ends meet. But if they lose their jobs, they will find it even harder to pay the bills.

Bookmark this article:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

Job inflation stays down as employers turn to flexible workforces

Jobs – there may be a lot of doom, but the employment market remains strong, and that’s why many argue there will be no recession.

It is a similar story in the US. Sure, employment has been falling, but there are still more people working today than a couple of years ago.

If the US is indeed in the midst of recession, and should the UK follow, then we have been seeing a rare example of a recession that is not accompanied by rocketing unemployment levels.

Some economists would argue that is impossible. They partially define a recession as rising unemployment, therefore a recession with high employment is in fact an oxymoron.

As for the UK, imagine this scenario: immigration flows go into reverse as rising wage levels in Eastern Europe make working in the UK less attractive. As a result, total employment falls, but conceivably unemployment falls too, as demand for the indigenous work force rises. It is not difficult to envisage a scenario in which GDP contracts at a time of falling unemployment.

At least if that happens, there will be a pick up in the market for printing economics books, because they will have to be rewritten.

Mind you, wages will rise.

And that brings us to the latest report from KPMG and Recruitment and Employment Confederation (REC) on the job market.

Pay rates have been going up now for 57 months, but April saw the lowest rate of pay inflation during that period.

But while wage inflation was falling, something else quite interesting has been happening.

“Recruitment consultants reported a modest fall in permanent staff appointments during April – the second in the past three months,” said KMPG, ”but contract staff appointments increased at the strongest rate in five months during the month.” Apparently, higher temp billings were underpinned by the fastest expansion in short-term vacancies since January.

Alan Nolan, Director at KPMG said, “These latest figures show clearly that employers are shifting away from hiring permanent staff into a more temporary workforce as a way of dealing with the current economic uncertainty and financial crisis. Cost reduction is very much on the agenda of employers not only through the reduction of headcount but also through ways of reducing tax and national insurance contributions. We see this trend most clearly in the financial services sector. On the other hand, in the medical, engineering and construction sector, demand for permanent staff is still strong because of the ongoing skills shortages in these areas.”

So, if temporary appointments are taking over from full time appointments, is it time to change the laws relating to temporary staff employment?

On this, Helen Reynolds, Acting Chief Executive Officer at REC had something to say, “Equal treatment measures between temps and permanent workers would be almost impossible to work out in practice and would add a completely unnecessary layer of bureaucracy for employers and agencies,” she said. “This in turn would limit job opportunities for thousands of workers at a time when it is crucial that we keep the labour market ticking in a challenging economy.”

Bookmark this article:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit