The Chinese bandwagon goes off the rails

Do you remember when they said the world has decoupled. The US can sneeze, they said; even find itself confined to bed with a hot-water bottle and a thermometer in its mouth, while the likes of China and the Eurozone could look on sympathetically, say something like bless you whenever Uncle Sam sneezed, and maybe even send a get well card, but, apart from that, just carry on normally.

Well, now we know it is not like that in the Eurozone. We know it isn’t like that in many places – with the whole global economy flirting with recession – but at least China was able to carry on regardless.

Well, now it seems even that idea has been proven false. It has important ramifications.

According to the World Bank, China is set to expand by 7.5 per cent next year, the slowest rate of expansion since 1990.

Now, between you, me and the gatepost, 7.5 per cent may seem pretty good, but don’t forget China still has vast untapped potential, not to mention massive poverty – a report last year said there are still 300 million Chinese people living on less than a dollar a day.

Also, bear in mind that these economic forecasts have developed this unfortunate trend of proving to be too optimistic. So, don’t be surprised if the forecast gets downgraded again.

The trouble is, in many parts of the world the economic crisis is still seen as largely an Anglo-Saxon problem.

It isn’t. The fundamental problem is that, on a global basis, there has been too much capacity and not enough demand for years.

Keynes didn’t say we should play with demand all the time to try and even out the economic cycle. Neither did he say an economy that had followed his policies for 6o years should adopt them even more enthusiastically when times get tough.

But he did say there can be occasions when economic crisis occurs because demand lags behind supply. You can understand why that was so in the 1930s – after all, the previous thirty or forty years had seen remarkable technological innovation that hadn’t been fully absorbed into the economy.

It is like that again. This time, it is the twin delights of globalization and technology that have created vast global capacity.

But the likes of the US, Spain, Oz, Denmark and Ireland, which have seen consumption boost growth, are satiated. Now it is time for the world’s savers to take the baton and boost global demand. If they don’t, we will all be worse off, and that very much includes the world’s savers.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

China discovers ghost of Keynes

And while the world talks, China does.

China has just announced a massive $586bn programme to get the economy moving again.

It is perhaps one of the most important moves seen yet by any government in the tale of this economic crisis.

The money will largely be used to fund infrastructure projects, such as new railways, subways and airports.

The $586 billion is roughly 7 per cent of China’s GDP.

With calls going out for the international community to act in unison, and for a worldwide stimulus programme, the Chinese action is ahead of the curve.

This week, China’s top man, President Hu Jintao is off to that summit in Washington, where the world leaders will be meeting up, planning their concerted action, and wondering what Barack Obama is up to, because he won’t be there.

It has been suggested that the Chinese growth machine is set to stall, with some saying it could fall to 6 per cent. That may seem high to you, but relative to recent growth that would mark a significant slowdown. And the last thing the world needs now is a Chinese economic slowdown.

It is thought that fiscal stimulus could add around 2 percentage points to growth.

But, as ever with these things, it does come with a catch. First of all, the Chinese government had already earmarked an even bigger spend as part of its five-year plan, and it is unclear how much of the investment announced today is new money, or is merely money already announced, and perhaps brought forward.

Secondly, what China really needs is more consumer spending. In some ways, China already looks somewhat over-invested. You know that feeling on Christmas Day, after lunch, when you feel as if you have completely overdone it. You feel completely stuffed.

Well, it is a bit like that in China, consumer spending needs to be afforded time to catch up with investment.

Mining companies have done especially well on the Chinese announcement. But there is a danger that the Chinese plan could lead to rising raw material costs.  That may be good for the miners, but it’s the last thing we need.

It is a tough one, but, on the whole, the Chinese announcement should be welcomed, especially if this proves to be the thin end of a Chinese wedge, and other measures follow.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

The Chinese dragon recoils and prepares for next flight

When the dust has settled on this saga in economic history, attentions will turn to China. Is it really a coincidence that the global economy hit its most serious financial crisis in almost 80 years, at a time when the US is slowly losing its position as the world’s largest economy?

If you cast your mind back, way back, to a different era, say, the beginning of this year, talk was the world had decoupled; that the US could hit recession, and the rest of the world could carry on growing. The US could sneeze all she wanted, went the idea behind decoupling, the rest of the world wouldn’t even need to take a paracetamol.

Then there’s that argument that the root cause of this crisis is too much debt. Well, if that is true, explain how it is that on a global basis there has been too much saving – a saving glut?

The truth is, there have been some pretty deep forces rumbling behind the scenes. If the US hadn’t spent its way forward earlier this decade, it is just possible the global economy would have hit recession equally earlier. It is just possible that US spending merely delayed the onset of global recession.

And the reason is this. The combination of new technology and globalization has changed the world. And change, no matter how positive, always brings a downside. Change can create effects that are unpredictable. Earlier this decade, cheap imports and fierce price competition encouraged by the Internet created the danger of deflation. This encouraged central banks to slash interest rates. At the same time, as global GDP expanded at a breakneck pace, global demand struggled to keep up with supply. This created excess savings, which found their way into countries like the US and UK. So it was the combination of low interest rates and excess savings from abroad that fed the Western debt bubble.

The Chinese growth story was also characterized by investment spending outstripping consumer spending. So, excess investment led to an overcapacity of infrastructure – roads going nowhere, for example – and this investment boom fed a thirst for raw material, leading to the commodity boom.

But now, the modern Chinese economy is maturing. This story of China’s growth may be hitting a new stage. The change has been forced upon China by the global financial crisis, but it was always inevitable that this would occur eventually.

In the third quarter, China’s GDP expanded at an annualized rate of 9 per cent. This was a much bigger slowdown than expected; according to Bloomberg, the consensus among economists was for growth of 9.7 per cent. This was the slowest growth rate in five years.

Now, a 9 per cent growth rate is still very impressive, of course, but if you peek below the surface the story gets more interesting.

Export growth is slowing. According to Bloomberg, the contribution to growth from trade, halved in the quarter. Of course, export growth is slowing. More and more economists are now talking about a global recession, and it was always inconceivable that China would see a continuation of export growth in such an environment.

This will inevitably have a knock-on effect upon the rest of the economy. But then the other side of the coin reveals a different story.

Retail sales soared a stunning 23.3 per cent. Meanwhile, urban disposable income for the first nine months rose by 14.7 per cent.

It seems China itself may be ready for a consumer boom.

For some time, Chinese producers have been a crucial component of global supply. Eventually, Chinese consumers will make up an important part of global demand, too, and it seems we are moving closer to that stage.

But there is a worry. Chinese factories are closing. Jobs are not as plentiful as they were. If one was to use kitchen scales to represent the Chinese economy, then what we are seeing is the export side of the scales losing weight, while the consumer spending side is gaining. The big question is this: will the consumer spending side be sufficient to make up for the loss of exports. Despite what the economists say, the jury is still out on that one.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

China sees big fall in inflation, but what about imports?

“We deliver the impossible, miracles take a little longer,” goes the saying. The Chinese growth story of recent years would have been considered impossible a few years ago, but is a miracle required for it to continue?

The thing you need to bear in mind about China is that if she experiences a growth rate which is merely quite a lot bigger than the growth rate enjoyed by other countries, then that would be considered by many to be a disaster.

In the three months from April to June GDP expanded by a stunning 10.1 per cent. Sorry, was that stunning? Ahhh, the China Daily described this growth rate as an example of a “continuous dip”.

This morning, news revealed that export sales expanded by 21.1 per cent in the year to August, and Bloomberg talked about growth slowing.

Today, the China Daily headlined: “Inflation retreats, slowdown worry grows.” It said: “Some economists have advocated a government stimulus plan, to jumpstart a raft of key projects nationwide with at least 100 billion yuan of government spending. Others suggest that Beijing give tax holidays to businesses and cut individual income tax to encourage domestic consumption.”

Everything is relative. The US sneezed, caught a cold, and which seems to have led to pneumonia. The lurgey has spread to Europe; as for China, it felt no more than the faintest of draughts, but it got the headline writers singing woe all the same.

Chinese inflation is down. In May it was 7.7 per cent, then it fell to 7.1 per cent, followed by 6.3 per cent, and then August saw inflation running at 4.9 per cent. So those falls are pretty rapid. The initial inflation surge in China was kicked off by the soaring price of pork, as blue ear disease killed off millions of pigs. The inflation disease spread, as Chinese consumers substituted their pork consumption for other goods. There are those who see the dip in Chinese inflation as temporary; the FT, for example, recently drew parallels with the US in the early 1970s, but the latest data would appear to contradict these fears.

What the global economy really needs is for China to start consuming more, to buy Western goods. If the calls for the Chinese government to respond to falling inflation by pushing up demand are answered, then that could be precisely what happens.

Don’t expect it all to occur overnight, however. China needs more balanced growth – it needs to see its consumers spend more. She can no longer rely on selling goods to the West, but not even China can change so fast that it will make a difference this year, and probably not next year, either.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

The world re-aligns

The last 24 hours have seen a number of important developments. Developments with the US, Japan, China and in Europe: developments with sterling – which has fallen to its lowest level against the dollar since the end of 2006, and the continuous fall in the price of oil and other commodities. It seems possible that as the credit crunch passes its first birthday, we are seeing stage two in this saga unfold; maybe the world is re-aligning.

It all started with China. Emerging economies are supposed to grow through borrowing. That’s how it has always been. It happened with the US in the late 19th century, it happened with Japan and it happened with the Tiger economies of Asia in the 1990s. But with China it was different. Not only has China enjoyed an extraordinary period of double-digit growth, it has done so while amassing huge foreign exchange reserves – it has done so while its citizens save at a rate far in excess of the saving ratios in the most frugal of developed economies, and rather than expanding by borrowing from abroad, China has lent money to foreigners so that they could then buy its products.

And many of the world’s developed countries obliged, the US and UK especially. As a result, debt grew and grew in some countries while spare savings just ballooned in China and oil-producing states.

Maybe that is why we really have a credit crunch today. Anglo Saxon borrowings were no more sustainable than third world borrowing in previous decades. So it was clear that countries such as the UK and US had to cut back, rein in their spending. In an ideal world, consumers would have stopped their borrowing of their own volition, but unfortunately it has taken a credit crunch instead. And that has been the story of the last year, the credit crunch has really been a manifestation of something many thought was inevitable anyway, a change in the way the UK and US did things.

Yesterday saw the latest in a long line of evidence to suggest the US is changing. In June US exports rose by a massive 4 per cent on the previous month, while non oil imports dropped by 1.4 per cent in June. The falling dollar has inevitably ceded an advantage to US exporters – while US consumers are buying less from abroad.

As the recent tax credit handed out to US householders slowly trickles out of the system, expect even bigger falls in US imports in future months.

Yet while the US consumer cuts back, the Chinese consumer at last goes out and spends. July saw the fastest rate of expansion in Chinese retailer sales in nine years, with sales up a stunning 23.3 per cent. At the same time, data revealed urban disposable income increased by 14.4 per cent in the first half of this year, and that is after allowing for inflation. Meanwhile, there has been good news on Chinese inflation, which fell to 6.3 per cent in July, the lowest level since September last year.

chinese inflation

And so it appears China is at last placing more emphasis on its consumer. It has to, there is no gas left in the US tank, it can no longer expand though importing to countries which are getting further and further into debt.

This is how it is supposed to be; it is called decoupling, that’s the idea that the world is no longer over-reliant on the US.

Yet a dark cloud is on China’s horizon.

A number of commentators have drawn comparisons with the current Olympics and the Olympics in Seoul 20 years ago, and Mexico 40 years ago. In both those earlier examples the economies had been through a dramatic growth spurt – but both economies then saw a sharp slowdown when the Olympics ended.

The Olympics are of course hugely expensive – and there are plenty of examples of economies struggling for years while the bill for hosting the games is paid. But for developing economies, this is especially expensive.

For China, there has been the added cost of closing down factories in Beijing during the Olympic fortnight.

But then again, the Chinese government has plenty of money – it can afford the games. The closure of factories for two weeks may not, in the scheme of things, prove that disastrous – maybe Chinese workers need a holiday – we all feel better and newly rejuvenated after a break, after all.

It also seems we often attach too much importance to apparent patterns. Just because Korea and Mexico experienced a severe economic slowdown after the Olympics it does not mean China will. Any scientific test based on a sample of two would be considered totally meaningless. Yet, just because two developing economies suffered after the Olympics we are expected to believe this proves it will always be like this.

And yet, can China really change the way it grows? Just about every major corporation in the world that is in a position to invest in China has already done so. It is clear that the economic model that has served China so well for the last few years is no longer tenable.

The model needs to change – and there is no guarantee this new approach, an un-tested model focused on Chinese consumers, can work.

So, China needs to change gradually. Gradual change from an economy reliant on overseas consumers to one reliant on domestic markets – and in the meantime it still needs overseas trade.

The rest of the world, of course, needs Chinese consumers. We all need to sell more goods to China.

And yet, while oil has fallen in price, it is still clearly too high. At current prices, trade is expensive. We keep hearing that now is the time to buy locally. They say it is because the cost of food is too expensive, so we need local produce. But this argument has no economic foundations to it at all. Since when has the solution to higher prices been less trade?

The real reason why there is a rise in the supply of products to local markets from indigenous producers has been the high cost of fuel. This is likely to exert even bigger problems as time goes on, and will present a massive problem to China over the next few years.

So, the US and UK slow, and the call goes out for more exports from the countries where consumers have run out of breath.

That is the real reason why the dollar has been falling. It is the real reason for falling sterling too.

But then, the last few weeks have seen evidence that the rest of the world really can’t afford to see US consumers spend less while the impact of the high price of oil is really being felt.

And then yesterday and this morning news broke that two of the world’s largest economies, economies Americans and Brits are supposed to be selling to, could be going off the rails. To find out more, read the next article.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

Japan stalls, as decoupling myth heads for dustbin

These days we are not supposed to be so reliant on Uncle Sam. If America sneezes the rest of the world catches a cold, they used to say. Well, right now, the US is doing far more than sneezing. The truth is that Uncle Sam has been confined to bed, wrapped in blankets, a hot water bottle by its feet while it sniffles and moans.

The UK is, of course, in the doctor’s surgery room, waiting to be told it too can have a sickie.

But Asia, at least, and maybe mainland Europe are supposed to be above all that now. The world has decoupled. The US is no longer the world’s hub.

If that is so, explain this. Japan saw its first fall in export orders in June for four years; now fears are growing the economy of the Rising Sun could be heading for an economic sunset – or at least a recession.

Economists had expected to hear exports had risen.

These days, the global economy is a bit like that children’s rhyme about our bones. You known the one: “The foot bone’s connected to the leg bone, the leg bone’s connected to the knee bone,” etcetera.

Well, China is connected to Japan, Japan is connected to the US, the US is connected to Europe, Europe is connected to China. Sorry about the complete failure to make that rhyme, but you get the point.

Almost 20 per cent of all Chinese exports are to the US. Just under 10 per cent of its exports are to Japan. Around 20 per cent of Japan’s exports are to the US. The list goes on. World trade is like a complex web, but the US still stands pretty much at the centre.

If Merrill Lynch’s forecast, reported here yesterday, that the US will contract by 0.5 per cent next year is right, then expect to see a big fall in US imports. This will have a big impact on the Chinese and Japanese economies.

For some time, economists have been arguing that China needs to see more economic impetus coming from its own consumers. This in turn will lead to a rise in Chinese imports. And enable the likes of the US to export their way out of trouble.

2009 will see the truth of those words, as China is left with no choice but to look towards its own citizens for the next phase of growth.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

The China miracle continues

Meanwhile, China expanded by 10.1 per cent in the year to the end of the second quarter. Okay, this was the slowest rate of growth since 2005, but frankly, any growth rate over 10 per cent is so remarkable that it would be just churlish to regret the falls from the heights of last year.

Inflation in China is down too. Not a lot, it is true, but June saw prices rise by 7.1 per cent, compared to 7.8 per cent in the previous month.

But, a cloud does hang over China. Exports were down. Ummm. Well, that isn’t quite true. Export growth was merely 21.9 per cent in the first half of the year compared with the same period last year. By contrast, the last half of 2007 saw annual export growth of 25.7 per cent.

And with a slowdown like that, speculation is growing that the Chinese government is set to put a halt to the rise in the yuan.

It would be a disaster if this happened.

A rise in Chinese exports is just not possible when the developed world is in such dire straits.

The US and UK need to export their way out of trouble. The US is China’s biggest trading partner, and while it is true it also does a lot of trade with Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong, never forget these territories trade with the US and Europe too. These days everything is connected. If the West is slowing, if countries such as the US and UK gradually move to a more sustainable growth path, based on higher savings, less imports and higher exports, then trade with China will be hit.

The high price of oil will hit trade too, as transport costs rise and rise.

China’s oil subsidies are merely disguising the impact of the high price of oil. But they can’t hide the rise altogether, and in the longer term won’t be able to hide the rise at all.

The Chinese growth story has reached that stage when she can no longer rely on growth through selling more and more to the wealthier countries. She needs to look internally, and allow Chinese consumers to have a bigger share in the growth story.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

HSBC shows it’s a world of two halves

Profits at HSBC are up on this time last year, yet the bank has just announced yet another massive write down.  Let’s run that past you again, but with a little more depth.

The bank made the headlines yesterday for announcing another $3.2bn (£1.6bn) of bad debt provisions, taking its overall losses related to the credit crunch so far to $15.6bn, and yet the bank said its first quarter profits are up on this time last year.

Remember last year?  That was a time when private equity was making the headlines with its leveraged buy-outs, when markets in the US kept hitting new, all-time highs, and when most economists would have laughed at you if you had said there was trouble ahead.

So it’s odd, isn’t it?  This time last year was, in comparison to right now, a time of rose-coloured spectacles.  A time when the corporate world appeared to be in blissful ignorance of the times that lay ahead.

Yet this time last year, HSBC, Europe’s largest bank, was making less money than it is now.

How can that be?

Well, you surely know the answer, or if you don’t, here is a clue.

Consider again, this bank’s name.   What do the letters HSBC stand for:  The Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation.

The world’s local bank, with its 10,000 offices in 83 countries, remains a bank with massively important links to the Far East.   And in the first quarter it was profits in Asia that helped offset its huge US losses.

And that in a nutshell describes the global economy.

Take as another example the stock market.  Why, when there is so much woe, has it performed as well as it has? As the famous economist, not to mention author of economic text books, Paul Samuelson once said, “the stock market had predicted nine of the last four recessions.”

Yet strangely, Mr Samuelson’s famous dictum was supposed to show that just because shares had fallen, it did not mean a recession was inevitable.   This time it is the other way round.   Recession seems inevitable, at least in some parts of the world, yet shares have remained relatively high.

Sure, shares are down on the heights reached last year, and sure, last summer saw a wobble, but actually, looking back it really wasn’t so bad: nothing like 1987, or the earlier years of this decade.

So why are shares doing so well when doom and gloom has become the staple diet of economics writers?

The answer: it’s a world of two halves, but big business is in both.

As was ably told in the Independent today, the top FTSE 100 companies earn only 36 per cent of their revenues in Britain. The balance is made up of 44 per cent made in the US and continental Europe and 20 per cent in the rest of the world.  The big oil and mining companies, for example, are major beneficiaries of the commodity boom.

And talking of the rest of the world, and one country in particular from the other half, Chinese retail spending jumped by a massive 22 per cent in the year to April. That is the biggest annual increase since 1999. 

Zhou Xiaochuan, the governor of China’s central bank was reported in Bloomberg as saying, “China needs to save less and boost consumption to rebalance an economy skewed toward investment and overseas sales.”

The human rights spotlight is on China, and we are told now is the time for economic boycotts, to hurt China where it really counts.

Yet, right now, the global economy needs China, more than it needs the global economy.

Sure, the argument that China can carry on growing without the rest of  the world is a myth.    China’s exports made up 39.7 per cent of GDP last year, and in the other direction: imports made up 31.9 per cent of GDP.   Even so, there is plenty of scope for Chinese investment to fall, and consumption to rise, which in turn will make up for any future falls in exports.

But remember, the Chinese economic growth story has literally pulled hundreds of millions from poverty.  Presumably it will continue to do so.

Right now, China has its hands full, after dealing with the appalling consequences of the earthquake in Sichuan Province.  It seems reasonable to assume that if this disaster had occurred a few years ago, the human cost in terms of casulties would have been much higher.

All eyes then to China with its production-led boom and India with its greater reliance on services.

And companies like HSBC, BP, Vodafone, Unilever, Rio Tinto and Xstrata, with strong links in these countries, still sit pretty – or at least a good deal less ugly than others.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

China sees retail spending leap – is she importing western consumerism?

Never forget, though, that while we slate central bankers for encouraging unsustainable consumer borrowing – actually the truth is a little more complex.

Sure, in countries such as the UK, US, Australia and Spain, consumer borrowing has gone through the roof, and saving has been far too low, but in other countries, such as Japan, China and the OPEC nations, saving has been too high.

On a global scale, maybe consumption has possibly been too low – and maybe that is the fundamental reason why we have had such low inflation for the last decade or so.

On the other hand, this saving has fed investment – which has led to inflation in the commodities market.  Remember that economist people say ignore oil when thinking about underlying inflation.  In fact, the fall in the price of clothes and furniture is just as much down to factors beyond the control of central bankers as the rise in the price of oil is beyond their control.  

High saving across the world has also fed consumer borrowing – leading to inflation of asset prices.

If we ruled the world, this is what we would do.  Make consumption in China rise, and savings elsewhere fall.

Well, maybe we do rule the world – for this morning, news emerged to suggest that decree of ours was obeyed.

During the January to February period, retail sales in China were no less than 20 per cent up on the year before.

As you know, Chinese inflation is soaring too, it reached 8.7 per cent in February.     It seems that part of the solution to China’s inflation would be to allow the Yuan to go up in value – making foreign goods more attractive, in turn enabling those economies in the West suffering from massive balance of trade deficits to start exporting some more.

Mind you, Capital Economics still reckons Chinese inflation is down to one-off hikes in the cost of food.  Apparently non-food inflation was just 1.6 per cent.

It seems to come down to your view of the world.  Are the recent rises in the price of food down to permanent and structural changes, and therefore likely to continue as demand rises?  Or are they just down to bad luck with the weather?

Either way, the rapid rise in Chinese retail spending has to be welcomed –  if the trend continues, one of the deepest imbalances in the global economy could be fixed.  Mind you, as ever when things like this happen, there will be some nasty pain en route – and sometimes we wonder if the credit crunch is a sign of deeper forces working.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit