The world re-aligns

The last 24 hours have seen a number of important developments. Developments with the US, Japan, China and in Europe: developments with sterling – which has fallen to its lowest level against the dollar since the end of 2006, and the continuous fall in the price of oil and other commodities. It seems possible that as the credit crunch passes its first birthday, we are seeing stage two in this saga unfold; maybe the world is re-aligning.

It all started with China. Emerging economies are supposed to grow through borrowing. That’s how it has always been. It happened with the US in the late 19th century, it happened with Japan and it happened with the Tiger economies of Asia in the 1990s. But with China it was different. Not only has China enjoyed an extraordinary period of double-digit growth, it has done so while amassing huge foreign exchange reserves – it has done so while its citizens save at a rate far in excess of the saving ratios in the most frugal of developed economies, and rather than expanding by borrowing from abroad, China has lent money to foreigners so that they could then buy its products.

And many of the world’s developed countries obliged, the US and UK especially. As a result, debt grew and grew in some countries while spare savings just ballooned in China and oil-producing states.

Maybe that is why we really have a credit crunch today. Anglo Saxon borrowings were no more sustainable than third world borrowing in previous decades. So it was clear that countries such as the UK and US had to cut back, rein in their spending. In an ideal world, consumers would have stopped their borrowing of their own volition, but unfortunately it has taken a credit crunch instead. And that has been the story of the last year, the credit crunch has really been a manifestation of something many thought was inevitable anyway, a change in the way the UK and US did things.

Yesterday saw the latest in a long line of evidence to suggest the US is changing. In June US exports rose by a massive 4 per cent on the previous month, while non oil imports dropped by 1.4 per cent in June. The falling dollar has inevitably ceded an advantage to US exporters – while US consumers are buying less from abroad.

As the recent tax credit handed out to US householders slowly trickles out of the system, expect even bigger falls in US imports in future months.

Yet while the US consumer cuts back, the Chinese consumer at last goes out and spends. July saw the fastest rate of expansion in Chinese retailer sales in nine years, with sales up a stunning 23.3 per cent. At the same time, data revealed urban disposable income increased by 14.4 per cent in the first half of this year, and that is after allowing for inflation. Meanwhile, there has been good news on Chinese inflation, which fell to 6.3 per cent in July, the lowest level since September last year.

chinese inflation

And so it appears China is at last placing more emphasis on its consumer. It has to, there is no gas left in the US tank, it can no longer expand though importing to countries which are getting further and further into debt.

This is how it is supposed to be; it is called decoupling, that’s the idea that the world is no longer over-reliant on the US.

Yet a dark cloud is on China’s horizon.

A number of commentators have drawn comparisons with the current Olympics and the Olympics in Seoul 20 years ago, and Mexico 40 years ago. In both those earlier examples the economies had been through a dramatic growth spurt – but both economies then saw a sharp slowdown when the Olympics ended.

The Olympics are of course hugely expensive – and there are plenty of examples of economies struggling for years while the bill for hosting the games is paid. But for developing economies, this is especially expensive.

For China, there has been the added cost of closing down factories in Beijing during the Olympic fortnight.

But then again, the Chinese government has plenty of money – it can afford the games. The closure of factories for two weeks may not, in the scheme of things, prove that disastrous – maybe Chinese workers need a holiday – we all feel better and newly rejuvenated after a break, after all.

It also seems we often attach too much importance to apparent patterns. Just because Korea and Mexico experienced a severe economic slowdown after the Olympics it does not mean China will. Any scientific test based on a sample of two would be considered totally meaningless. Yet, just because two developing economies suffered after the Olympics we are expected to believe this proves it will always be like this.

And yet, can China really change the way it grows? Just about every major corporation in the world that is in a position to invest in China has already done so. It is clear that the economic model that has served China so well for the last few years is no longer tenable.

The model needs to change – and there is no guarantee this new approach, an un-tested model focused on Chinese consumers, can work.

So, China needs to change gradually. Gradual change from an economy reliant on overseas consumers to one reliant on domestic markets – and in the meantime it still needs overseas trade.

The rest of the world, of course, needs Chinese consumers. We all need to sell more goods to China.

And yet, while oil has fallen in price, it is still clearly too high. At current prices, trade is expensive. We keep hearing that now is the time to buy locally. They say it is because the cost of food is too expensive, so we need local produce. But this argument has no economic foundations to it at all. Since when has the solution to higher prices been less trade?

The real reason why there is a rise in the supply of products to local markets from indigenous producers has been the high cost of fuel. This is likely to exert even bigger problems as time goes on, and will present a massive problem to China over the next few years.

So, the US and UK slow, and the call goes out for more exports from the countries where consumers have run out of breath.

That is the real reason why the dollar has been falling. It is the real reason for falling sterling too.

But then, the last few weeks have seen evidence that the rest of the world really can’t afford to see US consumers spend less while the impact of the high price of oil is really being felt.

And then yesterday and this morning news broke that two of the world’s largest economies, economies Americans and Brits are supposed to be selling to, could be going off the rails. To find out more, read the next article.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

Japan stalls, as decoupling myth heads for dustbin

These days we are not supposed to be so reliant on Uncle Sam. If America sneezes the rest of the world catches a cold, they used to say. Well, right now, the US is doing far more than sneezing. The truth is that Uncle Sam has been confined to bed, wrapped in blankets, a hot water bottle by its feet while it sniffles and moans.

The UK is, of course, in the doctor’s surgery room, waiting to be told it too can have a sickie.

But Asia, at least, and maybe mainland Europe are supposed to be above all that now. The world has decoupled. The US is no longer the world’s hub.

If that is so, explain this. Japan saw its first fall in export orders in June for four years; now fears are growing the economy of the Rising Sun could be heading for an economic sunset – or at least a recession.

Economists had expected to hear exports had risen.

These days, the global economy is a bit like that children’s rhyme about our bones. You known the one: “The foot bone’s connected to the leg bone, the leg bone’s connected to the knee bone,” etcetera.

Well, China is connected to Japan, Japan is connected to the US, the US is connected to Europe, Europe is connected to China. Sorry about the complete failure to make that rhyme, but you get the point.

Almost 20 per cent of all Chinese exports are to the US. Just under 10 per cent of its exports are to Japan. Around 20 per cent of Japan’s exports are to the US. The list goes on. World trade is like a complex web, but the US still stands pretty much at the centre.

If Merrill Lynch’s forecast, reported here yesterday, that the US will contract by 0.5 per cent next year is right, then expect to see a big fall in US imports. This will have a big impact on the Chinese and Japanese economies.

For some time, economists have been arguing that China needs to see more economic impetus coming from its own consumers. This in turn will lead to a rise in Chinese imports. And enable the likes of the US to export their way out of trouble.

2009 will see the truth of those words, as China is left with no choice but to look towards its own citizens for the next phase of growth.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

The China miracle continues

Meanwhile, China expanded by 10.1 per cent in the year to the end of the second quarter. Okay, this was the slowest rate of growth since 2005, but frankly, any growth rate over 10 per cent is so remarkable that it would be just churlish to regret the falls from the heights of last year.

Inflation in China is down too. Not a lot, it is true, but June saw prices rise by 7.1 per cent, compared to 7.8 per cent in the previous month.

But, a cloud does hang over China. Exports were down. Ummm. Well, that isn’t quite true. Export growth was merely 21.9 per cent in the first half of the year compared with the same period last year. By contrast, the last half of 2007 saw annual export growth of 25.7 per cent.

And with a slowdown like that, speculation is growing that the Chinese government is set to put a halt to the rise in the yuan.

It would be a disaster if this happened.

A rise in Chinese exports is just not possible when the developed world is in such dire straits.

The US and UK need to export their way out of trouble. The US is China’s biggest trading partner, and while it is true it also does a lot of trade with Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong, never forget these territories trade with the US and Europe too. These days everything is connected. If the West is slowing, if countries such as the US and UK gradually move to a more sustainable growth path, based on higher savings, less imports and higher exports, then trade with China will be hit.

The high price of oil will hit trade too, as transport costs rise and rise.

China’s oil subsidies are merely disguising the impact of the high price of oil. But they can’t hide the rise altogether, and in the longer term won’t be able to hide the rise at all.

The Chinese growth story has reached that stage when she can no longer rely on growth through selling more and more to the wealthier countries. She needs to look internally, and allow Chinese consumers to have a bigger share in the growth story.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

Speculators turn on China, and embrace Russia

There’s another conflict in the making – this time between hot money and lukewarm money, in China and other developing countries.    Meanwhile, Russia is celebrating its most promising outlook in, well, in a very long time.  

According to Bloomberg, currency speculators are about to swamp China with their speculative cash pile.

Remember when George Soros did it to us, back in 1992, when he forced sterling’s ejection from the ERM?  George is something of a moralist these days, full of philanthropic thoughts, leftish ideas about how markets do not self-correct if left to themselves, and the massive problem of what to do with $1bn a year income.

Mind you, in 1992, Soros reckoned the pound was too high.  He felt its fall was inevitable, so he bet against it.  And, of course, won.

It is different with China.  The view is the yuan is too low.

Bloomberg quoted Louis Kuijs, acting chief economist for the World Bank China as saying, “China is too large an economy not to have an independent monetary policy.”

As you know, China’s policy of only allowing the yuan to rise slowly against the dollar is one of the most contentious issues in economic debate today.

But the World Bank now thinks inflation in China this year will be 7 per cent, and if Mr Kuijs is right, then it could get a whole lot worse.

Yet, while the currency men may resort to pumping money in, the fund managers and the speculators in the equity arena are pulling their money out.

According to this morning’s Telegraph, fund managers are pulling their money out of China and India at “a record pace.”

It quoted David Bowers, who has just put together a Merrill Lynch survey of fund managers’ activities, as saying that fund managers no longer believe that developing countries have a grip on inflation.

But it is a different story for countries rich in commodities.     As a result, the Merrill Lynch report found massive interest among investors in Russia.

Mind you, Russia has its fair share of inflation problems too, and is far too reliant on commodity exports.

In 1998 the Russian crisis was made a whole lot worse by the rock bottom price of oil – it was just $10 a barrel back then.   At one stage the entire Russian stock market had a market capitalisation which was roughly the same size as Sainsury’s.  

As long as oil stays high, Russia will be laughing, and its oligarchs laughing some more. Western companies, such as BP, which dare try and make money off the back of the boom, will be accused of arrogance by Russian businessmen, as happened earlier this week.

Actually, the West really messed up with Russia.  Former winner of the Nobel Memorial Prize for Economics, not to mention former chief economist at the World Bank, Joseph Stiglitz, told in his book, Globalization and its Discontents, how the IMF helped make the Russian crisis of 1998 so much worse than it needed to be.

IMF action may have helped save some Western banks, and restricted the crisis largely to Russia, avoiding a recession in the West as a result, but in the longer-term this has led to a Russian mistrust of the West, free markets and democracy.

It was, by the way, a similar story in 1997 in the East Asia crisis. 

In both the Asian and Russian crises, the IMF prescription was for higher interest rates, and lower government spending.    The precise opposite of the policy advocated by Alan Greenspan for the US, when it faced a similar crisis, and the complete opposite of Ben Bernanke’s policies today.

In China, this led to concerted efforts to ensure she was never reliant on the IMF.  So, we had the scenario of growth funded largely by internal saving.  China is possibly the first-ever example of an economy growing rapidly while savings levels are high, and the balance of payments is in massive surplus.

If you really cut through the economic crisis today, and get to the core, you will find one of the key issues is the high level of saving in China.    This is partly down to the actions taken by the IMF in the late 1990s.
 

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

HSBC shows it’s a world of two halves

Profits at HSBC are up on this time last year, yet the bank has just announced yet another massive write down.  Let’s run that past you again, but with a little more depth.

The bank made the headlines yesterday for announcing another $3.2bn (£1.6bn) of bad debt provisions, taking its overall losses related to the credit crunch so far to $15.6bn, and yet the bank said its first quarter profits are up on this time last year.

Remember last year?  That was a time when private equity was making the headlines with its leveraged buy-outs, when markets in the US kept hitting new, all-time highs, and when most economists would have laughed at you if you had said there was trouble ahead.

So it’s odd, isn’t it?  This time last year was, in comparison to right now, a time of rose-coloured spectacles.  A time when the corporate world appeared to be in blissful ignorance of the times that lay ahead.

Yet this time last year, HSBC, Europe’s largest bank, was making less money than it is now.

How can that be?

Well, you surely know the answer, or if you don’t, here is a clue.

Consider again, this bank’s name.   What do the letters HSBC stand for:  The Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation.

The world’s local bank, with its 10,000 offices in 83 countries, remains a bank with massively important links to the Far East.   And in the first quarter it was profits in Asia that helped offset its huge US losses.

And that in a nutshell describes the global economy.

Take as another example the stock market.  Why, when there is so much woe, has it performed as well as it has? As the famous economist, not to mention author of economic text books, Paul Samuelson once said, “the stock market had predicted nine of the last four recessions.”

Yet strangely, Mr Samuelson’s famous dictum was supposed to show that just because shares had fallen, it did not mean a recession was inevitable.   This time it is the other way round.   Recession seems inevitable, at least in some parts of the world, yet shares have remained relatively high.

Sure, shares are down on the heights reached last year, and sure, last summer saw a wobble, but actually, looking back it really wasn’t so bad: nothing like 1987, or the earlier years of this decade.

So why are shares doing so well when doom and gloom has become the staple diet of economics writers?

The answer: it’s a world of two halves, but big business is in both.

As was ably told in the Independent today, the top FTSE 100 companies earn only 36 per cent of their revenues in Britain. The balance is made up of 44 per cent made in the US and continental Europe and 20 per cent in the rest of the world.  The big oil and mining companies, for example, are major beneficiaries of the commodity boom.

And talking of the rest of the world, and one country in particular from the other half, Chinese retail spending jumped by a massive 22 per cent in the year to April. That is the biggest annual increase since 1999. 

Zhou Xiaochuan, the governor of China’s central bank was reported in Bloomberg as saying, “China needs to save less and boost consumption to rebalance an economy skewed toward investment and overseas sales.”

The human rights spotlight is on China, and we are told now is the time for economic boycotts, to hurt China where it really counts.

Yet, right now, the global economy needs China, more than it needs the global economy.

Sure, the argument that China can carry on growing without the rest of  the world is a myth.    China’s exports made up 39.7 per cent of GDP last year, and in the other direction: imports made up 31.9 per cent of GDP.   Even so, there is plenty of scope for Chinese investment to fall, and consumption to rise, which in turn will make up for any future falls in exports.

But remember, the Chinese economic growth story has literally pulled hundreds of millions from poverty.  Presumably it will continue to do so.

Right now, China has its hands full, after dealing with the appalling consequences of the earthquake in Sichuan Province.  It seems reasonable to assume that if this disaster had occurred a few years ago, the human cost in terms of casulties would have been much higher.

All eyes then to China with its production-led boom and India with its greater reliance on services.

And companies like HSBC, BP, Vodafone, Unilever, Rio Tinto and Xstrata, with strong links in these countries, still sit pretty – or at least a good deal less ugly than others.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

China sees retail spending leap – is she importing western consumerism?

Never forget, though, that while we slate central bankers for encouraging unsustainable consumer borrowing – actually the truth is a little more complex.

Sure, in countries such as the UK, US, Australia and Spain, consumer borrowing has gone through the roof, and saving has been far too low, but in other countries, such as Japan, China and the OPEC nations, saving has been too high.

On a global scale, maybe consumption has possibly been too low – and maybe that is the fundamental reason why we have had such low inflation for the last decade or so.

On the other hand, this saving has fed investment – which has led to inflation in the commodities market.  Remember that economist people say ignore oil when thinking about underlying inflation.  In fact, the fall in the price of clothes and furniture is just as much down to factors beyond the control of central bankers as the rise in the price of oil is beyond their control.  

High saving across the world has also fed consumer borrowing – leading to inflation of asset prices.

If we ruled the world, this is what we would do.  Make consumption in China rise, and savings elsewhere fall.

Well, maybe we do rule the world – for this morning, news emerged to suggest that decree of ours was obeyed.

During the January to February period, retail sales in China were no less than 20 per cent up on the year before.

As you know, Chinese inflation is soaring too, it reached 8.7 per cent in February.     It seems that part of the solution to China’s inflation would be to allow the Yuan to go up in value – making foreign goods more attractive, in turn enabling those economies in the West suffering from massive balance of trade deficits to start exporting some more.

Mind you, Capital Economics still reckons Chinese inflation is down to one-off hikes in the cost of food.  Apparently non-food inflation was just 1.6 per cent.

It seems to come down to your view of the world.  Are the recent rises in the price of food down to permanent and structural changes, and therefore likely to continue as demand rises?  Or are they just down to bad luck with the weather?

Either way, the rapid rise in Chinese retail spending has to be welcomed –  if the trend continues, one of the deepest imbalances in the global economy could be fixed.  Mind you, as ever when things like this happen, there will be some nasty pain en route – and sometimes we wonder if the credit crunch is a sign of deeper forces working.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

Cure or poison: China prepares to loosen chains on yuan

Be careful with what you wish for, goes the famous saying. All young kids know from their fairly tales that wishes can go wrong, but here is a modern-day fairy tale. It doesn’t concern three pigs, rather it concerns millions of pigs, Sleeping Beauty is the world’s most populous country, and the big bad wolf, appears to be US paranoia.

For some time now, the US has had this tendency to blame all its ills on China. If only China would allow the yuan to appreciate, goes the argument, we would sell more goods abroad. Meanwhile, many US politicians, with Hilary Clinton in their vanguard, are calling for more protectionism.

Protectionism stands as one of the biggest threats to future global growth. Even Nicolas Sarkozy, not exactly a man known for his free-trade credentials, is worried about it. “If we do not want a return to protectionism we have to show transparency,” he warned yesterday, while he and his chums Angela Merkel, acting Italian prime minister Romano Prodi and EU president José Manuel Barroso, were round Gordon’s house in Downing Street for tea and biscuits.

But in addition to the wolf, this fairy tale has another beast: inflation. Yesterday, the IMF revealed its latest projections for the global economy, and it banged the inflation warning over and over again. Furthermore, it’s the developing world where rising prices pose the most serious worries.

In China it is a particular problem, because there is still an awful lot of poverty out there. Some even argue China is in a race to create wealth before unrest amongst those who are sill suffering from poverty leads to political instability.

And in trying to grapple with China’s poverty, the government faces a double dilemma.

On one hand it needs a cheap currency, to promote trade and exports. On the other hand, it needs to keep inflation under control, because when the price of pork (thanks to blue ear disease in pigs) soars by around 50 per cent in 12 months, which happened last year, Chinese peasants start getting very unhappy.

Last autumn, Capital Economics told the story well when it said, “In terms of per capita income, China is the 10th-richest country in Asia. But in terms of consumption, which is a more-accurate measure of individual welfare, China slips right down the rankings to 15. This is a result of China’s capital-intensive growth model and low social spending by the government. If it wants to make good on pledges to help the rural poor, the government will have to engineer a shift from investment to consumption-driven growth in future.”

So while an important aspect of allowing Chinese peasants to produce more and export their way to wealth lies in keeping the currency low, in order to try and remove the discontent that is bubbling beneath the surface in Chinese rural areas, the government needs to encourage more consumption and reduce inflation.

It is certainly the case that investment in China seems to be outstripping the need for it, with roads that, for example, appear to go to nowhere.

And maybe the way to reduce inflation, and increase consumption, is to let the currency appreciate.

So that’s the dilemma. Good reasons to keep the yuan cheap, good reasons to let it rise.

Well, it is inevitable that eventually China will appreciate the yuan, but it does seem that the day the yuan trades freely on the open markets will probably be the day when Chinese growth starts to slow. After all, investment in China may seem excessive, but it is investment that creates the foundations for rising production. Maybe it is excessive investment that lies behind the reason for Chinese growth, outstripping growth in India.

But then yesterday, Bloomberg news reported Eisuke Sakakibara, a former top official at Japan’s Finance Ministry, who appears to be someone in the know, as saying, “Chinese authorities now recognize that they need to appreciate their currency quite significantly for their own sake.”

So maybe then an era is coming to an end, and as a result of a rising currency, China’s growth will become more dependent on the consumer, and maybe eventually the US will find it is able to export more goods to that land beyond the Great Wall.

Maybe, in fact, you could argue that the latter day Great Economic Wall of China, a controlled currency, is set to go.

And if that happens good news will follow … eventually. Part of the underlying problem at the moment is that while spending is too high in some regions of the world, it is too low elsewhere. Across the world, savings and borrowings may match up, but in specific regions these two sides of the equation are completely out of kilter.

But, the key to all this is that word – eventually. Sure, as Chinese consumers spend more, and catch the western shop till you drop mentality, the global economy will return to balance.

But there will be pain en route. There is no avoiding this.

And that’s why we say there is danger in getting what you wished for. If the yuan is set to rise, then the single-biggest factor behind low inflation over the last few years – cheap Chinese imports, will become a factor creating inflation.

So when the Fed cuts interest rates and George W lays his plans to pump out $150bn in tax breaks, just remember these steps are merely painting over the cracks and do nothing to help resolve the underlying problem.

And as the underlying problem is slowly righted, as the yuan climbs, the US, not to mention Europe, will see a new inflationary phase, and interest rates will need to go right up again, and in countries where debt is high, that will be serious.

China might be granting Uncle Sam’s wish, but it’s a wish that may come back and bite.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit