Relief puts markets in a tizzy – as good news rises above bad

Yesterday was one of those busy days. The news came in from every front. In the world of banking, just for once, good news was the order of the day, but in the UK and Europe it was another day of worry.

Good news hit the price of oil too, as it emerged inventory levels in the US were much higher than expected, suggesting US demand for oil is falling fast. And from beyond the Great Wall, a truly promising set of data was revealed.

Yet disaster also came and dealt a blow yesterday too, both in the US with news on inflation – which was just awful, and in the UK with the latest alarming job data.

In this day of pluses and minuses, the bulls won; at least they did in the US, and then in the Far East with markets seeing big daily rises.

Is this the sign that bottom has been reached? Or merely one of those freakish days you get from time to time?

For banks the news seemed bad, but markets loved it.

Wells Fargo, the giant US commercial bank, announced a 22 per cent drop in earnings. “Oh dear,” you are probably saying, “so that’s more bad news.” Well no, the markets didn’t see it like that. So down in the dumps have analysts been lately, that they saw a mere 22 per cent drop in earnings as being positively wonderful news. Shares surged 32.8 per cent as a result. Markets knew things were bad, but for one glorious afternoon, it seemed as if they weren’t just as bad as they had thought.

The Fed helped too. You will recall, on Tuesday Ben Bernanke appeared before the Senate Banking Committee, and really said very little that wasn’t obvious. But yesterday, it was the House Financial Services Committee which heard the benefit of Ben’s wisdom, and this time a little snippet was slipped in, which got the markets in a tizzy. He was talking about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two mortgage giants which underpin the US mortgage markets, and Ben said that the twosome are in “no danger of failing.”

That was it. Four words. Four words we knew really, because it was inconceivable the Fed would allow their failure. But it was nice to hear those words from Ben’s lips.

By the way, Bernanke also said they were having difficulty raising more capital. But then again he said they were “adequately financed.”

But in the UK, yesterday it was HBOS’ turn to feel the heat. With the closing deadline for the bank’s rights issue looming, it is just looking less and less likely to come off, and it seems that this time the underwriters will have to start earning their fees, and cough up maybe all of the money.

And what a lot of money it is too. In all, the bank is raising £4 billion – and if the underwriters do end up footing the bill, it will be the largest rights issue to fail since 1987, or so said the FT this morning.

Mind you, HBOS is not alone. Barclays Bank has its troubles too, and many are doubtful that its £4.5bn capital raising will go quite the way planned. Shareholders are unlikely to stump up all the money, and it is thought Qatar Investment Authority may end up pumping in all the money, single-handed – and find itself with a 10 per cent chunk in the bank too.

But here is the oddity.

There seems to be a feeling that in Europe the banking turmoil may be nearing the end. In the US, where markets were so buoyant yesterday, more bad news could be winging its way to us all.

Writing in the Independent, Hamish MacRae pointed out that the prospective dividend yields on FTSE 100 companies is now higher than on ten-year gilts. He says this has not happened since the 1950s.

In fact, says Mr MacRae, the average dividend yield on FTSE 100 companies is 5 per cent. There is a snag though with this bullish thought. If company write downs continue to mount, and the fund-raising game continues, one assumes dividends will be cut – and cut by quite a bit too.

In a way, there are parallels here with the buy-to-let property market. One view is that rental yields will act as a kind of bottom for the market. But as one reader pointed out on our blog, you can’t squeeze blood out of a stone. People can’t pay rent they can’t afford. And neither can corporate Britain continue to pay dividends at the levels we have become used to.

In the US, by contrast, there is a feeling that the banking crisis has further to go. Yesterday saw sharp falls in the dollar, and there were growing fears that foreign investors may be about to give up the ghost on the US.

Today, all eyes turn to Merrill Lynch. It’s her turn to reveal quarterly profits – or is that quarterly losses. The last three quarters all saw losses, most expect the latest to be like that too. Really, Wall Street’s mood will depend on the extent of the losses. So this time tomorrow we will know.

But, while the mood on Wall Street was one of excitement and promise yesterday, the economic data told a quite different story. In fact, the news on inflation and the rate of interest was downright awful; to find out why, read the next article

Bookmark this article:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

The bear roars as Fannie and Freddie whimper

And so the FTSE 100 hit bear territory. At close of play on Friday, it was 21 per cent below last year’s high point.

It is a little curious, but the Dow Jones is also down from its high point by almost exactly the same margin.

When you think about it, the US economy is in a right royal mess. The latest mess to come on the heels of the previous mess is, of course, the troubles of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

And the amount of money entailed is just staggering. The US government is to ask Congress for unlimited authority to prop up the two financial institutions. It may need an awful lot. The not so dynamic duo guarantee more than $5.3 trillion worth of mortgages. To put that in context, US national debt is only $9 trillion.

It is not surprising they are in so much trouble. As mortgage defaults surge, they are left picking up the bill. But, they really can’t be allowed to fail. At least, not go bust. That really would be a disaster for the US economy that could set back an economic recovery for years and years. So, money has to be dished out – money that makes the Northern Rock bail out seem like a walk in the park. Even the US government will notice this one.

And yet, with the terrible fear dangling like the sword of Damocles, the Dow Jones suffers no more of a disaster than the FTSE 100.

In fact, in a way, the Dow’s performance is better. Last year, the Dow hit an all-time high. The FTSE still failed to climb above the 6,930 mark seen on the last day of the last millennium.

Right now, the Dow is 21.6 per cent down from its all-time high, set last year. The FTSE 100 is 24 per cent down from its all-time high, set on 31 January 1999.

The truth is, the FTSE 100 has not just entered bear territory at all; it never left it in the first place. And its dreadful performance of the last few weeks is a reflection of the lack of confidence by the City in the banks and builders. And that, in turn, is a reflection of how much faith the City has in house prices.

dow and FTSE

Bookmark this article:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

US and UK markets approach 2008 nadir

As the green shoots of spring first started to show, the roller coaster ride that is the stock markets seemed to come to a halt.

On the 10 March, the Dow fell to 11,740, just 18 points up on the 14 December 2000 level, the peak from the previous boom, before dotcoms bust.

But then, the index just went up. Talk was that we had passed the halfway mark in the credit crisis, that more than half of all the total number of related write-downs which would eventually be announced had been revealed.

And the Dow soared– hitting 13,058 in early May. Sure, the index was well down on its all-time high of 14,164 set last October, but at least it was within 10 per cent of that peak.

The FTSE 100 hit its nadir a week later. On 17 March it had fallen to just 5,414, 1,500 points below the all-time high of 6,930 set on the last day of the last century.

By 19 May, the FTSE was standing at 6,376.

It seemed the great bear run was over.

But one dissenter was George Soros. You may recall, at the time he made headlines when he talked about the worst financial crisis since the 1930s, about how we were paying the price for 25 years of policy mistakes – of over reliance on the rate of interest.

He also predicted a second dip in the stock markets.

Well in some parts of the world, in China for example, the markets have just gone down and down since then. But then the Chinese stock market was a bubble. It had bubble written all over it. We said so. Lots of people said so. Some Chinese people said, “In China it is different, you are applying Western ideas to China.” But, of course, it was a bubble, and it has burst.

But it was supposed to be like that in the UK and US. P/e ratios are low. In fact, so low have p/e ratios fallen, that Barratt actually saw its market capitalisation fall below projected profits for the year.

But while house builders have seen their share price fall – quite ridiculously, really; people say Gordon Brown did not fix the UK’s roof when the sun was shining, but what about house builders. They have had ten years of plenty, and now analysts are panicking over their stability.

But, at close of play on Friday, the Dow stood at just 11,842, just 140 points above the year low. The FTSE 100 was down to 5,620, 200 points above the year low.

And this is one of the curious things of this saga. It is now eight and a half years since the FTSE 100 peaked. The Dow is only just over the peak from eight years ago. This, at a time of falling house prices.

The collapse of asset prices is symptomatic of a 1930s-type crisis – which was characterised by deflation.

Now, stock markets are not good at telling the future. Economist Paul Samuelson once famously said: “The stock market has forecasted 9 of the last 4 recessions.”

The recent surge in stock prices, on the verge of such a major economic slowdown, also seemed daft.

It took 25 years for the stock market to recover from the 1929 crash. It does sometimes feel as though the stock market has still not recovered from the 1999/2000 crash.

The housing boom that followed that crash may have just disguised the true story.

markets 08

Bookmark this article:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

Perfect storm gathers

It was windy across the economic landscape yesterday.    Trees of hope were blown down, and old chestnuts dropped from their branches, leaving their flaws exposed.

The winds blew across stock markets – this time the Dow fell another 153 points, taking the fall this year to 1303 points (9.9 per cent), and 2423 points (17 per cent) down on the year-high set in October last year.  The FTSE 100 was down 12 per cent from the year’s beginning and 16 per cent down from the seven year high set in July last year.

But look elsewhere, and the signs of storm damage were just as obvious.

Oil was up yet again, this time it was trading at $107.65 at the time we took our daily reading from the New York Mercantile Exchange. The black stuff is now up $8 this year, but then remember it started 2008 at an unthinkably high level – and is now around $30 up on the price seen last September, which at the time was a record.

Then take a look at that sector that did so much to push equity prices up last year,  and at the same time sat in another storm, this time of controversy:  Private Equity.

Profits at Blackstone were down by 90 per cent in the last quarter. It’s just the latest Private Equity firm to feel the pinch – but at least this time some sunlight seeped through the dismay.     Referring to the credit crisis, Steve Schwarzman, chairman and founder said, “It is uncomfortable while we are in the midst of it, but it is during these disruptive periods that we can make our best purchases. It has created enormous opportunities to buy cheaply.”

Meanwhile, another storm blew through Marks and Spencer, as its resident Superman, Sir Stuart Rose announced a boardroom shuffle, and while the company was at it, revealed the little matter that its chief exec is being promoted.

Sir Stuart has long maintained 2009 will be the year he steps down as CEO, and much speculation has surrounded who his successor will be, how MS will cope without him, and whether Sir Stuart would stay involved, or perhaps fly back to the planet Krypton.

Now we know; Sir Stuart will continue to wear his Marks and Spencer underpants on top of his trousers while overseeing the MS story until at least 2011 – but in the role of executive Chairman.

Put all that news together and you have a dramatic wind, and yet we have not even told the half of it.

For yesterday also saw a tornado  blow across the world of UK property market forecasting, as the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors revealed the results of its latest property market survey – and this time, trees of property market hope were left strewn across the economic drive.  To find out why, read the next article.

Bookmark this article:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

Dow sinks as

If 2007 was a year of extraordinary volatility, then 2008 seems to be on course to outdo it. So far this year, the Dow has fallen by over 200 points in one day no less than 7 times.

Pity us. Once upon a time, a fall of that magnitude would have made a nice juicy headline – now, it’s just more of the same. Yesterday, the Dow finished the day at 12,501; that’s 277 points down on the day, and 1,662 points down on the all-time high set last October. That means, by the way, it is 12 per cent below the record,  meaning we are in correction territory, again.

The FTSE 100 fell to 6,026; that’s 695 points down on the seven-year high set at the end of October. The index has now fallen by 10 per cent of from peak to trough, so it just falls into correction territory too.

Yesterday’s falls were due to the banks. This time, Citigroup revealed an $18.1 billion write-down, mainly related to subprime debt, and a $9.83bn loss – the worst quarterly loss in the banking giant’s history.

Even more worrying, analysts weren’t impressed with the talk given by the bank’s new CEO, Vikram Pandit. Mr Pandit said the figures were “unacceptable,” but there is a suspicion that we have still not heard the full story, and more losses by the bank are still to follow.

Meanwhile, both Citigroup and Merrill Lynch announced more fundraising and investments from sovereign funds. This time the government of Singapore Investment Corporation topped the list of investors – it is pumping in $6.8 billion into Citibank. In all Citigroup said it is now raising $14.5bn; meanwhile, Merrill Lynch, $6.6bn.

The quote of the day must go to Charles Geisst, a Wall Street historian. He told the FT, “Not since before World War I, have companies gone looking for foreign capital as much as they are now.”

Bookmark this article:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

FTSE falls to lower level than start of last year

You may recall that last November, oil went to within a smidgeon of $100 a barrel. It went up again at the beginning of this month, but by this morning the black stuff was down to $92.86. Okay, that is still high, but at least it has fallen by around 6 per cent over the last six weeks or so. But here is something odd, while oil has fallen in dollars, when measured in pounds, it has barely changed at all.

In fact last November, when oil hit its then all-time high, the cost of a barrel in sterling was £47.92. This morning, it was costing £47.39. (That’s based on oil on the New York Mercantile Exchange, which we monitor.)

At 1.9595 dollars to the pound, not only is the UK’s currency now down 14 pence on the high set at the end of last year, it is actually lower than the levels seen at the beginning of last year.

The euro to pound ratio is now, of course, at around it lowest all time level.

But the pound is not the only icon to see the rises of last year cancelled out. This morning the FTSE 100 opened at a lower level than its opening position at the beginning of 2007. For a while last year it seemed that the FTSE 100 would at last hit a new all-time high but, alas, it was not to be.

Mind you, maybe it’s not surprising the FTSE 100 is so far down. According to a report from Ernst Young, 2007 saw the highest level of profit warnings since 2001. Even more worrying, the last quarter of last year was the worst-performing period, with profit warnings up 20 per cent.

The worry is this. We know the consumer is not feeling too well, and probably needs to take to his or her bed, and take it easy for a few months while the debt temperature falls. So the UK needs business. The slowdown in 2001 was caused by a business-led crisis - and the economy was kept going by the consumer.

The last recession, which did its worst in the early years of the ’90s, was caused by a consumer slowdown - the fear has to be that this time, both industry and the consumer are coming off the rails at the same time.

The good news from the Ernst and Young data, two of the worst-hit areas were in retail and leisure - that’s pubs and clubs. This would suggest it is a consumer problem still.

But more worrying is the latest report from the Office for National Statistics. Manufacturing output decreased by 0.2 per cent in the three months to November 2007 compared with the three months to August 2007.

Capital Economics says, “Overall, we do not think that it will be too long until the deterioration in the economic climate both at home and overseas pushes the manufacturing sector into its fourth recession in eleven years”. It concluded “Industry will contribute, rather than offset, to a weakening in overall economic activity this year.”

And yet hope does seem to be coming from over the horizon. The bugle is playing and the cavalry might yet save us. Surely the falling pound will make our industry more competitive, and exports will help push the UK along. The snag with this, the falling pound won’t really show up in improving stats on our manufacturing sector until the year’s end.

And here’s the warning. The Bank of England has to play this carefully. A falling pound will ultimately lift the UK, providing the benefits of a falling pound are not cancelled out by inflation.

So the Bank of England must not lower interest rates too much; on the other hand, it’s expectations of falling rates that in part lie behind the falling pound. So you see the problem?

Bookmark this article:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit