Where next for the pound?

There is a mystery a-brewing. US interest rates are falling like a pig, shorn of its wings, from the sky. And yet the dollar has not fallen in tandem. If you take into account interest rate expectations, then this really becomes quite surprising. Fed chairman, Ben Bernanke, has metaphorically chartered a fleet of helicopters carrying monetary stimulus to try and boost the US economy, but, by contrast, the central bank in the UK still seems to be fretting over inflation and this moral hazard argument – that banks are being bailed out through encouraging them to do more of the same things that created the mess in the first place.

Put all that together and it would appear the gap between US and UK interest rates is set to climb.   Then take into account that Until March last year, US and UK interest rates were the same. Then the Fed lowered rates while the Bank of England raised them.

In the short term there seem to be two main reasons for money to flow into a country. Money will flow in to chase higher interest payments, and it will flow in if the recipient country is seen to be having good economic prospects.

Bear that in mind, and all of a sudden the reasons for the sharp fall in the dollar relative to the pound last year become clear.

But the pound has since dropped back, falling from $2.10 last autumn to this morning’s price of 1.98. So if the expectations for US interest rates are so low, while at the same time the outlook for the US economy seems awful, why has the pound weakened?

It seems there are three possible explanations. Explanation 1: markets believe the Bank of England will change its tune, and will soon join the Fed in a race to see who can cut interest rates the quickest. Explanation 2: markets expect the UK economy to go the way of the US, and slow, possibly even toying with recession. Explanation 3: things are actually working the way the economic text books say they should, and the pound is at last responding to the fact the UK suffers from a massive deficit on its current account.

Recently, the deficit in Britain’s balance of payments current account as a percentage of GDP overtook the deficit seen in the US, but even that doesn’t tell the full story. One theory doing the rounds is that the official figures on Britain’s balance of payments deficits understate the reality, because the figures don’t accurately reflect the extent to which UK company profits have occurred overseas.

It was about this time last year that Warren Buffett said he was getting out of dollars; there was no magical reason for his decision. He decided the US current account deficit was too high.

Economists have for some time dismissed current account deficits as not really mattering  if capital flows into the country with the deficit increase.  It is certainly the case that both the US and UK are on the receiving end of massive capital flows.

Maybe, though, investors have become more discerning. Sovereign Wealth Funds are demanding an awful lot more bang for their buck, while the dollar and perhaps the pound have lost much of their appeal to investors.

Maybe this is the true reason for the credit crunch, foreigners are no longer happy to pump money into the economies of the Anglo Saxon world for such a lousy return.

And what is the lesson for this story? It is that in the long run, deficits in the balance of payments current account do matter, after all. For years, economists have dismissed as groundless, fears that the US balance of payments deficit would end in tears, saying this was as about as likely as pigs flying. Well, it seems that just may have happened. The economic pig may have taken to the wing.  

Bookmark this article:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

FTSE falls to lower level than start of last year

You may recall that last November, oil went to within a smidgeon of $100 a barrel. It went up again at the beginning of this month, but by this morning the black stuff was down to $92.86. Okay, that is still high, but at least it has fallen by around 6 per cent over the last six weeks or so. But here is something odd, while oil has fallen in dollars, when measured in pounds, it has barely changed at all.

In fact last November, when oil hit its then all-time high, the cost of a barrel in sterling was £47.92. This morning, it was costing £47.39. (That’s based on oil on the New York Mercantile Exchange, which we monitor.)

At 1.9595 dollars to the pound, not only is the UK’s currency now down 14 pence on the high set at the end of last year, it is actually lower than the levels seen at the beginning of last year.

The euro to pound ratio is now, of course, at around it lowest all time level.

But the pound is not the only icon to see the rises of last year cancelled out. This morning the FTSE 100 opened at a lower level than its opening position at the beginning of 2007. For a while last year it seemed that the FTSE 100 would at last hit a new all-time high but, alas, it was not to be.

Mind you, maybe it’s not surprising the FTSE 100 is so far down. According to a report from Ernst Young, 2007 saw the highest level of profit warnings since 2001. Even more worrying, the last quarter of last year was the worst-performing period, with profit warnings up 20 per cent.

The worry is this. We know the consumer is not feeling too well, and probably needs to take to his or her bed, and take it easy for a few months while the debt temperature falls. So the UK needs business. The slowdown in 2001 was caused by a business-led crisis - and the economy was kept going by the consumer.

The last recession, which did its worst in the early years of the ’90s, was caused by a consumer slowdown - the fear has to be that this time, both industry and the consumer are coming off the rails at the same time.

The good news from the Ernst and Young data, two of the worst-hit areas were in retail and leisure - that’s pubs and clubs. This would suggest it is a consumer problem still.

But more worrying is the latest report from the Office for National Statistics. Manufacturing output decreased by 0.2 per cent in the three months to November 2007 compared with the three months to August 2007.

Capital Economics says, “Overall, we do not think that it will be too long until the deterioration in the economic climate both at home and overseas pushes the manufacturing sector into its fourth recession in eleven years”. It concluded “Industry will contribute, rather than offset, to a weakening in overall economic activity this year.”

And yet hope does seem to be coming from over the horizon. The bugle is playing and the cavalry might yet save us. Surely the falling pound will make our industry more competitive, and exports will help push the UK along. The snag with this, the falling pound won’t really show up in improving stats on our manufacturing sector until the year’s end.

And here’s the warning. The Bank of England has to play this carefully. A falling pound will ultimately lift the UK, providing the benefits of a falling pound are not cancelled out by inflation.

So the Bank of England must not lower interest rates too much; on the other hand, it’s expectations of falling rates that in part lie behind the falling pound. So you see the problem?

Bookmark this article:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

Pound falls on interest rate hopes

“It ain’t the rate of interest that’s the problem,” said Airbus Jean-Claude Trichet, yesterday, “it’s the lack of credit.”

You will recall, yesterday, the President of the European Central Bank took Helicopter Ben (Bernanke’s) idea for solving a credit crisis by scattering money across the land a step further. Mr Trichet and his ECB cohorts announced an extraordinary 349 billion euro cash injection, propting us to nick-name him Airbus Jean.

You would have thought, after pumping all that money out there, the ECB would be lowering interest rates soon. But yesterday the great cash splatterer told the European parliament “the risks to price stability over the medium term are clearly on the upside.” He also said that price stability requirements and the need to get banks to start lending again are separate issues.

Naturally, banks and commentators saw red at those words. Kevin Gaynor, Head of Economics and interest-rate strategy at RBS in London told Bloomberg “It can’t have temporary support for the market stretching into six months and yet maintain the fig leaf that monetary policy is based on an unchanged view of economic risks.”

But, Mr Trichet could be right. The crisis we are seeing at the moment is not down to official interest rates, it’s down to market interest rates. Central banks want us to lend and borrow at one rate. The markets are forcing this level higher although, by the way, interbank rates do seem to falling.

Meanwhile, in the US, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond President Jeffrey Lacker said “Because the job of a central banker is to protect the purchasing power of currency, it is overall inflation that we need to keep down, not just core inflation…I am uncomfortable with the inflation picture.”

Yet, in the UK, after the Bank of England dropped a size 10 hint that interest rates are going to fall several times next year, markets started to work out the ramifications.

The pound fell. At the time of writing it stood at $1.99, the lowest level since June. We predicted yesterday that if the Bank of England really does slash interest rates next year, the pound is likely to be the casualty.

Not that this would necessarily be a bad thing. If the UK could find it is able to export its way to growth, that would be be good news indeed, although it could lead to more inflation.

But was we have said before, when both the US and UK suddenly start importing a good deal less, but export more, it is naive to believe the global economy can just carry on regardless.

Bookmark this article:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit