Watchdog warns against false IVA claims

It must be a sign of the times. As though the soaring number of individuals with serious debt problems was not bad enough, a new breed of vulture is trying to exploit their misery by giving them poor advice. 

The Office of Fair Trading has warned a dozen firms to stop making false claims to individuals who have declared themselves insolvent and taken out an Individual Voluntary Arrangement or IVA.

The latter is an agreement,  between a debtor and his or her creditors, to repay  a portion of the money they owe over a set period of time, with the help of an insolvency practioner.

There is less stigma associated with IVAs compared to bankruptcy and you will normally be able to keep your home.  To abandon such an agreement could have serious consequences as the cost of setting up an IVA can be considerable and is irrecoverable.

Bankruptcy, by contrast, is the ‘nuclear option’ for anyone in serious debt.  It can mean the losing your home, forfeiting control over your finances, losing access to credit and can place restrictions on the type of employment you can pursue.

The offending firms have been sending unsolicited letters to insolvent individuals advising them to cancel their IVAs and to go bankrupt instead. The letters suggest that the individual’s original IVA might have been mis-sold or inappropriate and that to go bankrupct would be a better course of action.

The OFT has warned the companies that if they do not stop their mailings they will be fined or closed down because encouraging someone to scrap an IVA could make their financial position worse.

 If you want to complain about receipt of one of these letters, or have another consumer gripe, the OFT Direct website  is a mine of useful information on your consumer rights and how to gain redress  http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/

There were more than 44,331 IVAs taken out in 2006, compared with fewer than 5,000 in 1998. The figures began to fall during 2007, but are expected to rise again during 2008.

The number of individuals choosing bankruptcy stood at 13,080 in the first quarter of 2008. This was up from 11,674 in the previous three months, but a decrease of 13 per cent on the number of petitions in the same quarter of 2007.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

Dramatic increase in second charge loans

The dramatic growth in second charge loans being secured by creditors against debtors’ homes reflects the increased determination of creditors to get their money back, as the  the credit crunch drives up the number of households in serious debt.

The number of court orders issued by lenders to secure these charging orders rose 42 per cent in 2007 to 131,644, according to the Ministry of Justice.

Lenders have traditionally pursued debtors through the small claims courts for repayment, but the  rise in the size of unsecured household debt and the upsurge in bankruptcies have prompted creditors to  apply for a second charge on debtors’ property when that fails.

While charging orders rarely result in homeowners being re-possessed, they are a useful way for  creditors to ensure that they get repaid when the house is eventually sold, because a charging order will rank as as a second mortgage and be paid after the principal mortgage and any consolidated loans have been settled.

John Fairhurst of debt advisory company, Payplan, says the number of people with charging orders on their properties could be much higher than the official figures suggest, because the latter don’t account for instances where debtors voluntarily give their creditor a second charge on their home, in return for for a freeze on their debt or some other inducement.

Fairhust says: “A charging order gives comfort to the creditor that if the debtor goes bankrupt, they will get their money back, with interest. They are treating these orders almost as an insurance policy for repayment.

“The typical client we see has £40,000 of unsecured debt in the  form of credit card debt and personal loan,  which the creditor is unlikely to get back of in a bankruptcy,  whereas a second charge on a property will rank third or fourth. So it’s worthwhile for creditors to spend £200-£300 on a charging order.”

Payplan expects an upsurge in bankruptcies and IVAs later this year as the credit crunch limits the availability of easy credit for those with poor payment histories. The debt advisory firm makes its money by charging creditors 10 per cent of any money it recovers as a result of putting clients onto a debt management plan, although a few companies such as GE Capital refuse to do so.

“Some debt recovery organisations working on behalf of the big banks have become very aggressive of late, so I expect to see more charging orders in the coming months,” says Fairhurst.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit