September financial services market overview

The near collapse of the global banking system in September left financial advisers stunned as they tried to come to terms with the implications of recent events for their businesses and clients.

UK and global insurers revealed over £1.5bn of exposure to Lehman Brothers and insurer AIG, with Axa, Aegon and Aviva declaring exposure to both, while Friends Provident, Zurich Financial and Royal Liver confirmed exposure to Lehman Brothers only.
 
IFAs scrambled to assess the potential losses for clients’ capital invested in structured products underwritten by Lehman Brothers, such as those offered by Meteor, Arc, NDF and DRI.

The takeover of HBOS by Lloyds TSB raised the prospect of a new super bank controlling 28 per cent of the UK mortgage market, leading to adviser concerns over competition and cuts in
procuration fees. 

Advisers also wondered about the future of Swip and Insight’s multi-manager propositions and the new bank’s plans for the protection market, when the two banks merge with an 18 per cent share of the life insurance market once the Scottish Widows, Clerical Medical and Halifax Life brands are all under one roof.

The Investment Management Association issued a warning about the lack of transparency and performance information on retail structured products and the FSA was severely criticised for allowing structured products to go unregulated.

On the Retail Distribution Review front, Financial Services Consumer Panel chairman, Lord Lipsey, said he thought the FSA would seek a middle way on the strict division of sales and advice set out in the interim RDR report.

Simply Biz chairman, Ken Davy, called for the RDR to allow advisers to have the choice of gaining a diploma or equivalent qualification within six years or working under the supervision of a qualified adviser.

A mandatory deadline for higher qualification in the final RDR report would force 10- 30 per cent of IFAs out of the industry, Davy said.
 
But the Personal Finance Society said the number of advisers who hold the chartered financial planner qualification had leapt by 50 per cent in the last 12 months.  The Society also established a group of pensions experts to lobby HMRC for greater clarity on QROPs regulations.

Advisers welcomed the FSA’s decision to investigate absolute return funds with regard to their development, risk management and Treating Customers Fairly, while IFA firm, Hargreaves Lansdown, said it did not think the FSA’s ban on the short selling of 32 financial stocks until 16 January 2009 would adversely affect these funds. 

Elsewhere, APCIMs attacked the FSA for failing to do an adequate cost-benefits analysis of its TCF requirements.

Meanwhile, the Lib Dems at their party conference vowed to tackle the disincentives to save via personal accounts, axe higher rate relief on pensions, urge the FSA to fund a system of generic advice via an industry levy and endorsed equity release as a way of boosting pensioner incomes.

Pensions Minister Mike O’Brien said the Government would report on the effect of means-testing in December and dismissed the ‘wild claims’ that had been made about the number of people likely to be affected.

Meanwhile, research by Fidelity revealed startling differences on the returns of mainstream funds over a five year period, depending on the fund wrapper used. Highest returns were from collective funds, followed by offshore and onshore bonds due to the CGT changes effective since April 2008 which make collective funds more tax efficient for most investors.

The Irish Government’s decision to guarantee the retail deposits held by six of  Ireland’s largest financial institutions ratcheted up the pressure on the UK Government to do likewise.

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit

All in one life product plugs gap in protection

It’s nice to see an insurance company launch a customer friendly product for a change. I’m  referring to Fortis’s Real Life protection plan, launched in conjunction with the broker, Life Search.

In  brief, Real Life incorporates seven protections - including term assurance, critical illness and income protection - all within one plan, obviating the need for the broker to sell three separate policies.

The plan works by having two pots - one for term assurance claims and one for critical illness and income  protection claims. Although not ideal, the plan has the advantage of providing broad, albeit limited, protection against death and loss of income.

Most people have some form of life cover, via with profit endowments, term assurance, whole of life policies or through workplace benefits. Far fewer people have protection against being unable to work because of long term illness.

While life cover only benefits your dependants if you die, critical illness and income protection pay the bills if you survive.

Critical illness pays you a lump sum if you survive 30 days from diagnosis of a serious illness, such as heart attack, stroke or cancer, while income protection pays you a monthly income if you are unable to work because of long term sickness.

In the case of Real Life, it works like this. Say, you buy £250,000 of life cover, there are two pots to draw on - a  £250,000 pot for term assurance, and a £250,000 pot for critical illness and income protection.

If you are diagnosed with critical illness, you can claim 12 per cent of amount in your pot, which in this case would be £30,000. You can make up to three critical illness claims, providing they are for different illnesses and there is still money in the pot.

If you make an income protection claim, it will pay out 1 per cent of the pot each month, or £2,500 in this example, until the pot runs out after eight years and four months (£2,500×100 months).

Although the income protection cover is clearly limited, the policy is a step in the right direction in that it will help close the protection gap that currently exists and the premiums are fixed for life.

As an example, a 25 year old woman office worker in normal health would pay £18.02 a month for  £100,000 of life cover up to age 60. Unless she increases the level of cover, the premium is guaranteed not to rise.

The plan is currently only sold via Life Search and Asda, but there are plans to roll it out to other brokers soon.

Matt Morris of Life Search says: “The whole point of Real Life cover is the protection it provides against all the eventualities of life. Nowadays, you are far more likely to suffer a serious illness or long term incapacity before age 65, than to die.”

For more information visit:

www.reallifecover.co.uk
www.lifesearch.co.uk
http://www.asdafinance.com/life-insurance-real-life-cover.html 

Bookmark this article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Reddit